EST. 2026 · INDEPENDENT SATIRE & COMMENTARYNOT A NEWS AGENCY ↗
YOU ARE VISITOR NUMBER*187690since 15 August — Need Independence

We have nothing to do with it. They did it!

A public service for people still suspicious of forwarded messages.
BEST VIEWED WITHA WORKING
BULLSH*T DETECTOR.
Best viewed in the 90s on Netscape Navigator at 800×600
⚡ BREAKING BAKWAAS
Sources close to sources confirm sources remain close to the matter.   ✦   Context has entered the chat.   ✦   Read before you forward.   ✦   Historical claims. Fresh eyebrows.  
Science?? · CLAIM PERIOD: 2013 · 2 MIN READ

India lit up. The caption took liberties.

That colourful satellite image is not an annual festival photograph.

Original editorial illustration. Not an image of the event.

THE CLAIM

A widely shared multicoloured satellite image shows India illuminated on Diwali night.

Summary of the documented claim, not a verbatim quotation.
WHAT THE SOURCES ESTABLISH

Mislabelled image: it is a composite showing change over time.

Back on planet Earth.

NASA's own Earth Matters explanation identifies the colourful image as a composite created and coloured by NOAA scientists in 2003 to show population growth over time. It is not a single-night photograph of festival lights. NASA also points to an actual night-time satellite image using data collected in November 2012.

The distinction is between a real scientific visualisation and the incorrect story attached to it. Colours in a composite can encode information rather than reproduce what a camera would see. None of this diminishes a celebration on the ground; it simply means that the image's legend deserves as much attention as its brightness.

OUR TWO PAISE / SATIRICAL COMMENTARY

A decade of data cannot fit into one evening, even with excellent lighting.

BAKWAAS-O-METER™

Creative Interpretation

Our editorial reaction to the claim, not its subject. The factual finding above is separate from the joke. How to read the meter →

They did it. Here are the receipts.

Check the linked record and its surrounding context. Original records and independent reporting are labelled separately. External links open in a new tab.

Found a hole in our homework?

Identify the disputed statement, explain the problem and send evidence. Credible challenges are reviewed; substantive corrections are dated here. A challenge does not automatically remove a report. Our corrections approach →

CHALLENGE THIS REPORT →
Dates & correction history

Prepared 28 October 2026. No corrections recorded in this edition.

While you’re questioning things…

BACK TO THE ARCHIVE ↗