EST. 2026 · INDEPENDENT SATIRE & COMMENTARYNOT A NEWS AGENCY ↗
YOU ARE VISITOR NUMBER*187690since 15 August — Need Independence

We have nothing to do with it. They did it!

A public service for people still suspicious of forwarded messages.
BEST VIEWED WITHA WORKING
BULLSH*T DETECTOR.
Best viewed in the 90s on Netscape Navigator at 800×600
⚡ BREAKING BAKWAAS
Sources close to sources confirm sources remain close to the matter.   ✦   Context has entered the chat.   ✦   Read before you forward.   ✦   Historical claims. Fresh eyebrows.  
Business · CLAIM PERIOD: 2016 · 2 MIN READ

A banknote. Not a tracking device.

₹2,000, zero satellite superpowers. A remarkably ambitious job description for a piece of paper.

Original editorial illustration. Not an image of the event.

THE CLAIM

The ₹2,000 banknote contains a nano GPS chip that can track hidden cash.

Summary of the documented claim, not a verbatim quotation.
WHAT THE SOURCES ESTABLISH

False: the note did not contain a tracking chip

Back on planet Earth.

AFP examined circulating posts claiming a nano chip was hidden in the ₹2,000 note. Its reporting records the RBI’s denial and distinguishes the note’s security features from the supposed tracking device. A convincing diagram is not a hardware specification.

This entry concerns the chip rumour associated with the 2016 note and revived in later posts. It is not advice about the note’s present exchange or legal-tender status. The archived report contains examples of the circulating claim and the response.

OUR TWO PAISE / SATIRICAL COMMENTARY

The note could disappear from your wallet. That did not make it a stealth satellite.

BAKWAAS-O-METER™

WhatsApp PhD Level

Our editorial reaction to the claim, not its subject. The factual finding above is separate from the joke. How to read the meter →

They did it. Here are the receipts.

Check the linked record and its surrounding context. Original records and independent reporting are labelled separately. External links open in a new tab.

The source reports document the original claim and supporting material. We have not independently authenticated every embedded original; follow the provenance in the linked investigation.

Found a hole in our homework?

Identify the disputed statement, explain the problem and send evidence. Credible challenges are reviewed; substantive corrections are dated here. A challenge does not automatically remove a report. Our corrections approach →

CHALLENGE THIS REPORT →
Dates & correction history

Prepared 28 October 2026. No corrections recorded in this edition.

While you’re questioning things…

BACK TO THE ARCHIVE ↗