EST. 2026 · INDEPENDENT SATIRE & COMMENTARYNOT A NEWS AGENCY ↗
YOU ARE VISITOR NUMBER*187690since 15 August — Need Independence

We have nothing to do with it. They did it!

A public service for people still suspicious of forwarded messages.
BEST VIEWED WITHA WORKING
BULLSH*T DETECTOR.
Best viewed in the 90s on Netscape Navigator at 800×600
⚡ BREAKING BAKWAAS
Sources close to sources confirm sources remain close to the matter.   ✦   Context has entered the chat.   ✦   Read before you forward.   ✦   Historical claims. Fresh eyebrows.  
Science?? · CLAIM PERIOD: 2019 · 2 MIN READ

Rocket science, reassigned to the weather desk.

The impressive white plume was real. Its new job description wasn't.

Original editorial illustration. Not an image of the event.

THE CLAIM

A viral video shows a NASA machine designed to generate rain clouds.

Summary of the documented claim, not a verbatim quotation.
WHAT THE SOURCES ESTABLISH

Misidentified machinery: the footage shows a rocket-engine test.

Back on planet Earth.

Alt News traced the circulating footage to a Top Gear segment about a NASA rocket-engine test. Its report explains the water-vapour plume produced when liquid hydrogen and oxygen are used by the engine, and links relevant footage.

A visible cloud does not establish that the machine's purpose is to manufacture weather. Condensation from an engine test and a practical rainmaking system are different claims. This check concerns the particular machine shown; it is not a denial that cloud-seeding research or other atmospheric experiments exist. The lesson is mundane but useful: identify what the equipment actually does before placing an order for one.

OUR TWO PAISE / SATIRICAL COMMENTARY

Delivery estimate: one rocket engine. Monsoon not included.

BAKWAAS-O-METER™

Complete Bakwaas

Our editorial reaction to the claim, not its subject. The factual finding above is separate from the joke. How to read the meter →

They did it. Here are the receipts.

Check the linked record and its surrounding context. Original records and independent reporting are labelled separately. External links open in a new tab.

The source reports document the original claim and supporting material. We have not independently authenticated every embedded original; follow the provenance in the linked investigation.

Found a hole in our homework?

Identify the disputed statement, explain the problem and send evidence. Credible challenges are reviewed; substantive corrections are dated here. A challenge does not automatically remove a report. Our corrections approach →

CHALLENGE THIS REPORT →
Dates & correction history

Prepared 28 October 2026. No corrections recorded in this edition.

While you’re questioning things…

BACK TO THE ARCHIVE ↗