EST. 2026 · INDEPENDENT SATIRE & COMMENTARYNOT A NEWS AGENCY ↗
YOU ARE VISITOR NUMBER*187690since 15 August — Need Independence

We have nothing to do with it. They did it!

A public service for people still suspicious of forwarded messages.
BEST VIEWED WITHA WORKING
BULLSH*T DETECTOR.
Best viewed in the 90s on Netscape Navigator at 800×600
⚡ BREAKING BAKWAAS
Sources close to sources confirm sources remain close to the matter.   ✦   Context has entered the chat.   ✦   Read before you forward.   ✦   Historical claims. Fresh eyebrows.  
Politics · CLAIM PERIOD: 2017 · 2 MIN READ

Nostradamus predicted a disclaimer. Eventually.

An alleged ancient prophecy met a very modern update: this was a spoof.

Original editorial illustration. Not an image of the event.

THE CLAIM

Nostradamus predicted an Indian leader named “Narendrus”.

Summary of the documented claim, not a verbatim quotation.
WHAT THE SOURCES ESTABLISH

Not an authenticated prophecy; the publisher later labelled the piece satire

Back on planet Earth.

A 2017 article presented alleged Nostradamus passages involving “Narendrus”. Newslaundry examined the claims and then documented a crucial update: the Times of India blog was republished with an explicit spoof disclaimer.

That later labelling belongs in the record. We are not presenting the piece as a genuine recovered prophecy, nor ignoring that its author and publisher subsequently described it as satire. The lesson is about the travel of purported quotations and the importance of checking the source page—including its later corrections or disclaimers.

OUR TWO PAISE / SATIRICAL COMMENTARY

A prophecy that needs a later disclaimer has at least predicted the existence of editors.

BAKWAAS-O-METER™

Creative Interpretation

Our editorial reaction to the claim, not its subject. The factual finding above is separate from the joke. How to read the meter →

They did it. Here are the receipts.

Check the linked record and its surrounding context. Original records and independent reporting are labelled separately. External links open in a new tab.

Found a hole in our homework?

Identify the disputed statement, explain the problem and send evidence. Credible challenges are reviewed; substantive corrections are dated here. A challenge does not automatically remove a report. Our corrections approach →

CHALLENGE THIS REPORT →
Dates & correction history

Prepared 28 October 2026. No corrections recorded in this edition.

While you’re questioning things…

BACK TO THE ARCHIVE ↗