EST. 2026 · INDEPENDENT SATIRE & COMMENTARYNOT A NEWS AGENCY ↗
YOU ARE VISITOR NUMBER*187690since 15 August — Need Independence

We have nothing to do with it. They did it!

A public service for people still suspicious of forwarded messages.
BEST VIEWED WITHA WORKING
BULLSH*T DETECTOR.
Best viewed in the 90s on Netscape Navigator at 800×600
⚡ BREAKING BAKWAAS
Sources close to sources confirm sources remain close to the matter.   ✦   Context has entered the chat.   ✦   Read before you forward.   ✦   Historical claims. Fresh eyebrows.  
Science?? · CLAIM PERIOD: 2023 · 2 MIN READ

A giant leap for recycled animation.

Apollo artwork got a Chandrayaan caption and an entirely new mission.

Original editorial illustration. Not an image of the event.

THE CLAIM

A viral video is NASA footage of Chandrayaan-3 landing on the Moon.

Summary of the documented claim, not a verbatim quotation.
WHAT THE SOURCES ESTABLISH

False: the clip is an older Apollo 11 animation.

Back on planet Earth.

Alt News matched the clip to Hazegrayart's Apollo 11 animation, including a version published in June 2021. The sequence depicts the American lunar mission and includes its recognisable landing audio. It predates Chandrayaan-3's August 2023 landing.

The animation was not a live recording from NASA's network. Its use under a new caption changed both the spacecraft and the event it purported to show. An artist's reconstruction can be valuable when correctly labelled, but a convincing rendering is not documentary evidence. The real mission did not need borrowed visuals to be significant; the misleading forward simply added a camera angle that belonged to a different story.

OUR TWO PAISE / SATIRICAL COMMENTARY

The spacecraft changed nationality somewhere between upload and forward.

BAKWAAS-O-METER™

Complete Bakwaas

Our editorial reaction to the claim, not its subject. The factual finding above is separate from the joke. How to read the meter →

They did it. Here are the receipts.

Check the linked record and its surrounding context. Original records and independent reporting are labelled separately. External links open in a new tab.

The source reports document the original claim and supporting material. We have not independently authenticated every embedded original; follow the provenance in the linked investigation.

Found a hole in our homework?

Identify the disputed statement, explain the problem and send evidence. Credible challenges are reviewed; substantive corrections are dated here. A challenge does not automatically remove a report. Our corrections approach →

CHALLENGE THIS REPORT →
Dates & correction history

Prepared 28 October 2026. No corrections recorded in this edition.

While you’re questioning things…

BACK TO THE ARCHIVE ↗