EST. 2026 · INDEPENDENT SATIRE & COMMENTARYNOT A NEWS AGENCY ↗
YOU ARE VISITOR NUMBER*187690since 15 August — Need Independence

We have nothing to do with it. They did it!

A public service for people still suspicious of forwarded messages.
BEST VIEWED WITHA WORKING
BULLSH*T DETECTOR.
Best viewed in the 90s on Netscape Navigator at 800×600
⚡ BREAKING BAKWAAS
Sources close to sources confirm sources remain close to the matter.   ✦   Context has entered the chat.   ✦   Read before you forward.   ✦   Historical claims. Fresh eyebrows.  
WhatsApp University · CLAIM PERIOD: 2018–2020 · 2 MIN READ

Two ticks, three ticks, one invented feature.

A forward gave the messaging app a surveillance dashboard it never announced.

Original editorial illustration. Not an image of the event.

THE CLAIM

Three blue ticks or red ticks on WhatsApp indicate government inspection or impending police action.

Summary of the documented claim, not a verbatim quotation.
WHAT THE SOURCES ESTABLISH

False: the claimed tick system was a hoax.

Back on planet Earth.

BOOM documented versions of the message in 2018 and 2019. Its reporting compared the forward with WhatsApp's explanation of delivery and read receipts and included a company spokesperson's denial that WhatsApp displayed three checkmarks in chats.

The hoax borrowed familiar interface symbols and added an alarming interpretation. That does not make it a product announcement. This finding is limited to the invented tick legend; it is not a blanket claim that devices, accounts or communications can never be compromised. A real discussion about privacy deserves actual evidence rather than a colour chart supplied by an anonymous forward.

OUR TWO PAISE / SATIRICAL COMMENTARY

The only confirmed extra tick was on the rumour's attendance sheet.

BAKWAAS-O-METER™

WhatsApp PhD Level

Our editorial reaction to the claim, not its subject. The factual finding above is separate from the joke. How to read the meter →

They did it. Here are the receipts.

Check the linked record and its surrounding context. Original records and independent reporting are labelled separately. External links open in a new tab.

The source reports document the original claim and supporting material. We have not independently authenticated every embedded original; follow the provenance in the linked investigation.

Found a hole in our homework?

Identify the disputed statement, explain the problem and send evidence. Credible challenges are reviewed; substantive corrections are dated here. A challenge does not automatically remove a report. Our corrections approach →

CHALLENGE THIS REPORT →
Dates & correction history

Prepared 28 October 2026. No corrections recorded in this edition.

While you’re questioning things…

BACK TO THE ARCHIVE ↗