EST. 2026 · INDEPENDENT SATIRE & COMMENTARYNOT A NEWS AGENCY ↗
YOU ARE VISITOR NUMBER*187690since 15 August — Need Independence

We have nothing to do with it. They did it!

A public service for people still suspicious of forwarded messages.
BEST VIEWED WITHA WORKING
BULLSH*T DETECTOR.
Best viewed in the 90s on Netscape Navigator at 800×600
⚡ BREAKING BAKWAAS
Sources close to sources confirm sources remain close to the matter.   ✦   Context has entered the chat.   ✦   Read before you forward.   ✦   Historical claims. Fresh eyebrows.  
WhatsApp University · CLAIM PERIOD: 2023 · 2 MIN READ

The rice factory was making rice. Plot twist.

A machine and an ominous caption turned fortification into a conspiracy.

Original editorial illustration. Not an image of the event.

THE CLAIM

A viral factory video showed a machine manufacturing plastic rice for people to eat.

Summary of the documented claim, not a verbatim quotation.
WHAT THE SOURCES ESTABLISH

False visual attribution: it showed fortified-rice production.

Back on planet Earth.

In this international example of a familiar forward format, AFP traced the clip to a 2021 advertisement by food-equipment maker SunPring Extrusion. The manufacturer said the machine processed broken rice flour into fortified kernels, not plastic. AFP also linked technical information on rice fortification.

The footage alone did not establish the alarming material claimed in the caption. Industrial food processing can look unfamiliar without being evidence of fraud. The finding applies to this identified video, not to every rice product or every food-safety complaint. Do not generalise a video check into a guarantee about something unrelated in your own kitchen.

OUR TWO PAISE / SATIRICAL COMMENTARY

The caption contained more artificial ingredients than the evidence.

BAKWAAS-O-METER™

Complete Bakwaas

Our editorial reaction to the claim, not its subject. The factual finding above is separate from the joke. How to read the meter →

They did it. Here are the receipts.

Check the linked record and its surrounding context. Original records and independent reporting are labelled separately. External links open in a new tab.

The source reports document the original claim and supporting material. We have not independently authenticated every embedded original; follow the provenance in the linked investigation.

Found a hole in our homework?

Identify the disputed statement, explain the problem and send evidence. Credible challenges are reviewed; substantive corrections are dated here. A challenge does not automatically remove a report. Our corrections approach →

CHALLENGE THIS REPORT →
Dates & correction history

Prepared 28 October 2026. No corrections recorded in this edition.

While you’re questioning things…

BACK TO THE ARCHIVE ↗