EST. 2026 · INDEPENDENT SATIRE & COMMENTARYNOT A NEWS AGENCY ↗
YOU ARE VISITOR NUMBER*187690since 15 August — Need Independence

We have nothing to do with it. They did it!

A public service for people still suspicious of forwarded messages.
BEST VIEWED WITHA WORKING
BULLSH*T DETECTOR.
Best viewed in the 90s on Netscape Navigator at 800×600
⚡ BREAKING BAKWAAS
Sources close to sources confirm sources remain close to the matter.   ✦   Context has entered the chat.   ✦   Read before you forward.   ✦   Historical claims. Fresh eyebrows.  
Bollywood · CLAIM PERIOD: 2025 · 2 MIN READ

Phone-a-friend met edit-a-friend.

Two unrelated recordings were introduced as one very awkward call.

Original editorial illustration. Not an image of the event.

THE CLAIM

A viral KBC clip showed Amitabh Bachchan making a call and being scolded by actor Mukesh.

Summary of the documented claim, not a verbatim quotation.
WHAT THE SOURCES ESTABLISH

Manipulated video: unrelated audio was inserted.

Back on planet Earth.

BOOM traced the angry Malayalam audio to an older recording involving Mukesh that circulated in 2015. It separately identified the KBC sequence as a surprise call involving contestant contact Khurram Kalam. The purported conversation between Bachchan and Mukesh was created by combining those materials.

An edited comedy clip can be entertaining, but it should not become a factual account of what two people said to each other. Recognising both voices is not enough: the recordings must belong to the same exchange. The source comparison matters more than the apparent smoothness of the edit. This entry evaluates the fabricated conversation, not either actor's character.

OUR TWO PAISE / SATIRICAL COMMENTARY

The connection was excellent. The conversation never connected.

BAKWAAS-O-METER™

Complete Bakwaas

Our editorial reaction to the claim, not its subject. The factual finding above is separate from the joke. How to read the meter →

They did it. Here are the receipts.

Check the linked record and its surrounding context. Original records and independent reporting are labelled separately. External links open in a new tab.

The source reports document the original claim and supporting material. We have not independently authenticated every embedded original; follow the provenance in the linked investigation.

Found a hole in our homework?

Identify the disputed statement, explain the problem and send evidence. Credible challenges are reviewed; substantive corrections are dated here. A challenge does not automatically remove a report. Our corrections approach →

CHALLENGE THIS REPORT →
Dates & correction history

Prepared 28 October 2026. No corrections recorded in this edition.

While you’re questioning things…

BACK TO THE ARCHIVE ↗