EST. 2026 · INDEPENDENT SATIRE & COMMENTARYNOT A NEWS AGENCY ↗
YOU ARE VISITOR NUMBER*187690since 15 August — Need Independence

We have nothing to do with it. They did it!

A public service for people still suspicious of forwarded messages.
BEST VIEWED WITHA WORKING
BULLSH*T DETECTOR.
Best viewed in the 90s on Netscape Navigator at 800×600
⚡ BREAKING BAKWAAS
Sources close to sources confirm sources remain close to the matter.   ✦   Context has entered the chat.   ✦   Read before you forward.   ✦   Historical claims. Fresh eyebrows.  
TV News · CLAIM PERIOD: 2023 · 2 MIN READ

New moon mission. Four-year-old outrage.

The clip travelled through time faster than the spacecraft travelled through space.

Original editorial illustration. Not an image of the event.

THE CLAIM

A viral BBC discussion questioning India's space spending was a response to Chandrayaan-3's 2023 landing.

Summary of the documented claim, not a verbatim quotation.
WHAT THE SOURCES ESTABLISH

Misleading context: the clip was from 2019.

Back on planet Earth.

Alt News located an upload from July 2019 and noted the Chandrayaan-2 wording visible in the bulletin. The BBC's press team also said the clip was old. The discussion was recirculated during Chandrayaan-3's successful landing in August 2023, and several Indian outlets treated it as a reaction to that event.

The underlying video was not fabricated. Its reassigned date and subject produced the misleading impression. Disagreeing with a broadcaster's question is one thing; moving that question to a different mission four years later is another. Check the on-screen mission name before launching the rebuttal.

OUR TWO PAISE / SATIRICAL COMMENTARY

The lunar landing was live. The outrage was a repeat telecast.

BAKWAAS-O-METER™

Creative Interpretation

Our editorial reaction to the claim, not its subject. The factual finding above is separate from the joke. How to read the meter →

They did it. Here are the receipts.

Check the linked record and its surrounding context. Original records and independent reporting are labelled separately. External links open in a new tab.

The source reports document the original claim and supporting material. We have not independently authenticated every embedded original; follow the provenance in the linked investigation.

Found a hole in our homework?

Identify the disputed statement, explain the problem and send evidence. Credible challenges are reviewed; substantive corrections are dated here. A challenge does not automatically remove a report. Our corrections approach →

CHALLENGE THIS REPORT →
Dates & correction history

Prepared 28 October 2026. No corrections recorded in this edition.

While you’re questioning things…

BACK TO THE ARCHIVE ↗