EST. 2026 · INDEPENDENT SATIRE & COMMENTARYNOT A NEWS AGENCY ↗
YOU ARE VISITOR NUMBER*187690since 15 August — Need Independence

We have nothing to do with it. They did it!

A public service for people still suspicious of forwarded messages.
BEST VIEWED WITHA WORKING
BULLSH*T DETECTOR.
Best viewed in the 90s on Netscape Navigator at 800×600
⚡ BREAKING BAKWAAS
Sources close to sources confirm sources remain close to the matter.   ✦   Context has entered the chat.   ✦   Read before you forward.   ✦   Historical claims. Fresh eyebrows.  
Bollywood · CLAIM PERIOD: 2020 · 2 MIN READ

The flour had a celebrity endorsement problem.

A feel-good story assigned its starring role before asking the actor.

Original editorial illustration. Not an image of the event.

THE CLAIM

Aamir Khan secretly distributed flour bags containing ₹15,000 each during the 2020 lockdown.

Summary of the documented claim, not a verbatim quotation.
WHAT THE SOURCES ESTABLISH

Attribution denied: Khan said he was not responsible.

Back on planet Earth.

The Times of India reported the viral story and Aamir Khan's public clarification on 4 May 2020. He said he was not the person putting money into wheat bags. The report did not establish whether someone else had carried out the alleged distribution.

That leaves a precise conclusion: attaching Khan's name to the story was unsupported and contradicted by his denial. It does not prove that no anonymous donation could have happened anywhere. Even generous, uplifting stories require accurate attribution. A celebrity's reputation cannot stand in for a source, and a touching plot is not improved by inventing its lead character.

OUR TWO PAISE / SATIRICAL COMMENTARY

The screenplay was heartwarming. The casting was unconfirmed.

BAKWAAS-O-METER™

Creative Interpretation

Our editorial reaction to the claim, not its subject. The factual finding above is separate from the joke. How to read the meter →

They did it. Here are the receipts.

Check the linked record and its surrounding context. Original records and independent reporting are labelled separately. External links open in a new tab.

The source reports document the original claim and supporting material. We have not independently authenticated every embedded original; follow the provenance in the linked investigation.

Found a hole in our homework?

Identify the disputed statement, explain the problem and send evidence. Credible challenges are reviewed; substantive corrections are dated here. A challenge does not automatically remove a report. Our corrections approach →

CHALLENGE THIS REPORT →
Dates & correction history

Prepared 28 October 2026. No corrections recorded in this edition.

While you’re questioning things…

BACK TO THE ARCHIVE ↗